What happens to Satoshi's BTC when Bitcoin's quantum problem is fixed?

What happens to Satoshi's BTC when Bitcoin's quantum problem is fixed?

Tech

Top cryptographers can't agree on Bitcoin's biggest quantum question

A Coinbase-convened panel says Bitcoin should start preparing for quantum attacks now, but declines to take a position on whether millions of vulnerable coins, including many linked to Satoshi Nakamoto, should eventually be frozen.

By

Shaurya Malwa

Jun 13, 2026, 6:07 a.m.

3

min read

Make

preferred on

Share

Share this article

Copy link

X icon

X (Twitter)

LinkedIn

Facebook

Email

Make

preferred on

Summary

Show

A Coinbase advisory council of leading cryptographers says quantum computers are not yet a threat to Bitcoin but urges the community to begin technical planning for post-quantum signatures now.

Roughly 6.7 million bitcoin are considered vulnerable to a future quantum attack, including about 1.7 million in early addresses likely tied to Satoshi Nakamoto and lost keys, fueling debate over whether to let those coins remain spendable.

The council declines to choose between proposals that could freeze or constrain vulnerable coins, instead stressing that compatible solutions can be combined and that users need clear communication and timely action from the Bitcoin community.

A Coinbase-convened advisory board of some of the most prominent cryptographers in the world has laid out what Bitcoin should do about the millions of coins a future quantum computer could steal, and on the hardest question, it refuses to answer.

The board, which

shared the report

with CoinDesk earlier this week, includes Scott Aaronson of the University of Texas at Austin, Dan Boneh of Stanford and Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation. Its starting point is that quantum computers are

not a threat to blockchains today

and that nobody knows when they will be, so the debate should not wait on a timeline.

The exposure is concentrated in Bitcoin, however. About 1.7 million bitcoin sit in roughly 20,000 early pay-to-public-key addresses, a format that publishes the owner's public key directly on the blockchain and leaves it open to a quantum attacker.

Many

are assumed to belong to

Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto and other owners who lost their keys, which means they can never be moved to safety. Another 5 million or so are exposed through address reuse, according to Project11, a research group tracking the issue, though most of those are thought to be active holdings in exchange wallets.

Swapping in quantum-resistant signatures is the easy part, but the fight is over the coins nobody moves.

One camp argues

for a hard deadline, after which the signature schemes Bitcoin uses today, ECDSA and Schnorr, stop being accepted and any unmigrated coins become unspendable. Leaving them live, this side says, hands a future attacker, potentially a sanctioned state like North Korea, a stash of bitcoin large enough to crash the price and taint the network's legitimacy.

The other camp calls that confiscation, a violation of the absolute property rights Bitcoin was built on, and warns it

sets a precedent for freezing coins

under government pressure later.

Between them sit the several proposals CoinDesk has tracked over the past two months.

Hourglass would cap

how many vulnerable coins can be spent per block to prevent a supply flood.

BIP-361

, from developer Jameson Lopp and others, would let migrated holders prove ownership after the cutoff with a quantum-resistant proof that exposes no key. PACTs, from Paradigm's Dan Robinson, would let owners timestamp a private claim now and move funds later without revealing anything today.

The Coinbase board, however, notes these are compatible and could be adopted together.

What the board will not do is choose. It writes that there is no correct answer and that the Bitcoin community has to decide. It commits to only two things, that the technical migration planning should start now because it is separate from the abandoned-coins question, and that holders need clarity so the issue does not fester.

"While the council takes no position on the abandoned coins debate, that's for the community to decide, they are direct about two things: Start the technical migration work now. The engineering work to support post-quantum signatures is independent of the governance debate and shouldn't wait for it."

"Communicate clearly. Users need to know this problem is being taken seriously. Uncertainty is its own risk," it adds.

The proposals multiply and the names attached to them get more serious. The instruction every version shares, move now, is the one Bitcoin has yet to act on while

Ethereum has spent years preparing

.

Latest Crypto News

1

Live markets: Bitcoin rebounds to nearly $60,000. Kospi, Nikkei sink

1 hour ago

2

Asset management giant Invesco files for tokenized fund targeting stablecoin reserve market

9 hours ago

3

Coinbase's Base blockchain resumes after two-hour outage disrupted network

11 hours ago

4

Strategy's yield-generating STRC stock is more correlated with BTC than ever

12 hours ago

5

Kraken in talks to buy 15% stake in DeFi lender Aave at $385 million valuation

13 hours ago

6

a16z-backed crypto firm rebrands, shifts focus to solving AI’s global copyright headache

13 hours ago

7

BlackBerry is making a massive comeback as an 'uncrashable' software layer for AI and robotics

14 hours ago

8

Strategy has a 10-month cash runway for dividends, but retail investors are losing faith

14 hours ago

9

Quant fund says bitcoin is near a major inflection point as rare onchain signals align

15 hours ago

10

Bitcoin tumbles to new multi-year low of $58,000, but a short-squeeze setup emerges

15 hours ago

Latest Research

CEX Volumes Drop to Lowest Since September 2024 as RWA Perps Hit Record High

CEX Volumes Drop to Lowest Since September 2024 as RWA Perps Hit Record High

In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high.

By

CoinDesk Research

Jun 15, 2026

In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high.

Why it matters

:

In May, combined exchange volumes fell 3.45% to $4.41T; the lowest since September 2024. RWA perpetual futures volumes rose 10.4% against the trend, hitting a new all-time high.

View Full Report

More From

Tech

Live markets: Bitcoin rebounds to nearly $60,000. Kospi, Nikkei sink

Coinbase's Base blockchain resumes after two-hour outage disrupted network

Live markets: Bitcoin settles in under $60,000

CD20

$1,603.52

CD20 down 3.59 percent

3.59%

BTC

$59,897.79

BTC down 2.83 percent

2.83%

ETH

$1,556.87

ETH down 5.72 percent

5.72%

XRP

$1.03

XRP down 4.76 percent

4.76%

SOL

$68.97

SOL down 0.56 percent

0.56%